.png)
Thecorporate capital management and financing is one of the most poorly diagnosed problems in the Spanish business ecosystem. Many companies seek external sources of financing when, in reality, the first step is to understand what part of their capital is working and what part is tied up and what specific instruments exist to address each situation. The short answer: optimizing working capital can free up liquidity, but never automatically or universally, and it almost always requires combining it with specific financing tailored to the business model and the company's current stage.
What does freeing up capital in a company really mean?
The term "freeing up capital" is used too loosely in financial discussions, and it is worth clarifying before drawing operational conclusions. Strictly speaking, freeing up capital means reducing the resources a company has tied up in its operating cycle (inventory, accounts receivable, supplier advances) to convert them into available cash. So far, the theory is sound. The problem lies in the leap made between identifying excess working capital and claiming that that excess is immediately recoverable cashprocess.
Analyses are circulating that, based on studies by major consulting firms on thousands of companies globally, present figures for "releasable" capital of a spectacular order of magnitude. The argument follows this mechanism: an excess of working capital—that is, working capital above the level required for efficient management—is identified, and it is concluded that this excess could be converted into cash without the need for external financing. The logical leap, however, is not justified. A significant portion of that excess corresponds to inventory with contractual commitments that cannot be undone without penalty, accounts receivable from clients with more bargaining power than the supplier, or sectors with seasonal cycles that force companies to maintain stock even if the theoretical model suggests otherwise. Identifying an excess in an aggregate of more than 17,000 companies across all geographies and sectors does not mean that any specific company can recover its proportional shareprocess.
At Intelectium, after supporting more than 450 companies, the first question we ask when someone talks to us about "trapped capital" is this: Is that capital trapped, or is it working? Suppose a hardware startup has 500,000 euros in inventory. If that inventory turns over in thirty days with a margin that justifies the investment, there is nothing to free up; there is something to finance correctly in order to keep growing. The confusion between capital tied up due to inefficiency and capital invested in the production cycle is the root of many poor decisions.
How does the business model affect working capital management?
The principle that revenue growth does not imply proportional cash growth is correct as a general statement. But its practical application depends critically on the specific business model, and presenting it as a universal warning without nuance can lead to erroneous conclusions.
In a SaaS model with upfront subscription billing , revenue growth can generate cash before the cost of service is incurred, which turns growth into a short-term liquidity generator. In a retailer with its own stock, where suppliers are paid in thirty days and customers pay in sixty, sales growth absorbs net cash at an accelerated rate: the more you grow, the more working capital financing you need. Treating these two cases with the same analytical framework is, as they say, putting the cart before the horse.
At Intelectium, we apply this criterion in our outsourced CFO service: before recommending any working capital optimization levers, we analyze the business model to understand if the issue is one of operational inefficiency or growth structure. For SaaS companies, the relevant indicator is not the traditional liquidity ratio, but the time elapsed from the investment in customer acquisition to the recovery of that cost through recurring revenue. For companies with physical inventory, the cash conversion cycle (days of inventory plus days of sales outstanding minus days of payables outstanding) is indeed a directly actionable lever, but its limits are imposed by actual bargaining power with customers and suppliers, not a theoretical model.
What working capital financing instruments are available in Spain?
There is a common gap in the working capital analyses circulating in the Spanish market: working capital optimization is discussed as if it were a purely internal discipline, without mentioning the ecosystem of specific financing instruments that exist in Spain and which are, for many SMEs and startups, the most immediate practical solution.
TheConfirming is an instrument through which a financial institution manages a company's payments to its suppliers, offering them the possibility of early payment in exchange for a discount. For the buying company, it improves payment management and can extend the effective payment term without damaging the relationship with the supplier. For the supplier, it means immediate liquidity. Non-recourse factoring, on the other hand, allows for the assignment of outstanding invoices to a financial institution that advances the amount and assumes the risk of non-payment. It is especially useful when the company has large clients with long payment terms but proven solvencyprocess.
TheICO liquidity lines are another relevant instrument in the Spanish context: the Official Credit Institute channels financing through banks to cover the working capital needs of SMEs and the self-employed, with terms that are often more favorable than those of direct bank financing. And for startups and growth-stage companies, alternative financing platforms that offer invoice factoring have gained ground as an agile solution when the traditional banking circuit is too slow or demanding regarding collateral.
An element that general analyses often completely ignore is the Spanish legal framework. The Late Payment Act (Law 3/2004 and its subsequent amendments) sets maximum payment terms between companies of sixty days and thirty days for Public Administrations. However, effective compliance with these deadlines is inconsistent, and its impact on the actual DSO (days sales outstanding) of Spanish SMEs is enormous. A company that sells to the Public Administration with actual collection times of ninety to one hundred and twenty days cannot apply the same collection management advice as a B2B company with private clients who respect contractual deadlines. Any recommendation on working capital optimization that ignores this legal framework is generic and cannot be directly applied in Spain.
When does it make sense to optimize working capital, and when should you look for external financing?
Working capital optimization is a tactical lever, not a strategic one. Based on Intelectium's experience with over 450 companies, my recommendation is as follows: the right time to work on working capital efficiency is when the company has already reached a validated business model, has positive unit economics and its problem is financing growth without diluting more than necessary. Before that point, trying to "free up capital" from working capital that is actually funding growth can hinder the speed of execution, which is the most critical asset in early stagesprocess.
In pre-seed or seed stages, negative working capital is often structural: the company is investing in product, team, and market before revenues scale. The solution is not to optimize working capital, but to raise the right amount of equity for the stage. In growth stages with traction, the right combination is usually: non-dilutive financing (instruments such as ENISA or CDTI, or Venture Debt) to extend the runway, and working capital optimization to avoid wasting cash on avoidable operational inefficiencies. In mature stages, the working capital lever gains importance and tools such as confirming or factoring become especially profitable.
There is also a hidden cost to aggressive working capital optimization that is rarely mentioned: the cost in speed and relationships. Artificially extending payment terms to suppliers improves the days payable outstanding ratio, but it damages relationships with key partners who are difficult to replace in hardware or logistics models. Reducing inventory frees up cash on paper, but in e-commerce, it can lead to stockouts that destroy margins and waste your investment in customer acquisition. Every optimization decision has a context and an opportunity cost that must be calculated before executionprocess.
If you are unsure whether your working capital is trapped or fueling your growth, we can review your situation in an initial session at Intelectium. Talk to the team →
Frequently Asked Questions
What is working capital and why does it matter for corporate financing?
TheWorking capital, also known as net working capital, is the difference between a company's current assets and current liabilities : essentially, the resources that fund the day-to-day operating cycle. Its management is critical in corporate finance because a company can be profitable on paper while facing serious liquidity problems if its working capital is poorly structured—that is, if it collects payments late, pays early, and accumulates inventory without sufficient turnover.
What is the difference between optimizing working capital and seeking working capital financing?
Optimizing working capital means taking action on internal processes: accelerating collections, negotiating payment terms, and reducing excess inventory. Working capital financing involves using external instruments (factoring, confirming, ICO lines, invoice discounting) to cover the gap between receivables and payables without having to wait for internal optimization to take effect. Both levers are complementary and the choice between one or the other depends on the company's current situation and the comparative cost of each option.
What is factoring and when should a Spanish SME use it?
TheFactoring is a financial instrument through which a company assigns its outstanding invoices to an entity (a bank or specialized platform) that advances the amount, usually minus a fee. In its non-recoursemodel, the entity also assumes the risk of non-payment. It is advisable to use it when the company has clients with long payment terms but good creditworthiness, and needs liquidity to continue operating or growing without waiting for those invoices to mature.
How does the Spanish Late Payment Law affect an SME's collection management?
TheLaw 3/2004 establishes maximum payment terms of sixty days between private companies and thirty days when the debtor is a Public Administration. In practice, however, compliance is inconsistent, and many SMEs that sell to large companies or the government experience actual terms that are much longer. This increases the Effective DSO (days sales outstanding) and creates working capital financing needs that cannot be solved simply by "optimizing internal processes."
When should a startup prioritize working capital optimization over raising external funding?
The rule of thumb we apply at Intelectium is as follows: working capital optimization makes sense when the company has already validated its business model and has positive unit economics. Before that point, forcing working capital efficiency can slow down growth, which is the real priority in early stages. In a critical runway (less than six months of cash) scenario, working capital optimization comes too late: the solution is external funding, whether it's a bridge loan, non-dilutive debt, or an equity round.
.png)
.png)
