In this article, we delve into how to structure a smart captable, avoid frequent errors and anticipate the effects of future investment rounds. Because yes: raising capital is only half the way.
According to our experience accompanying startups in their rounds, what is really critical is not just getting investment, but preserve control and maintain sufficient incentives so that the founding team continues to lead the project with vision and energy throughout the journey. A poorly managed cap table can hinder key decisions or even alienate strategic investors in future phases.
What is a Cap Table and why does it matter from day one?
A Cap Table (short for “Capitalization Table”) is a document that reflects the distribution of a company's capital among all of its shareholders. This includes founders, investors, employees with stock options, business angels and any other stakeholders with shareholding.
Although at first it may seem like a simple Excel with names and percentages, in reality It is a strategic instrument. Why? Because it reflects the balance of power within the company and is one of the first elements that investors analyze when studying an investment opportunity. A messy cap table, with too many minority shareholders, co-founders with unequal parts without explanation or without stock options reserved for key talent, This is usually an alarm signal.
In addition, it should be noted that the cap table is dynamic. It changes with each round of investment, with each increase in capital, and with each addition of talent with equity. Therefore, it is crucial to understand from the beginning how it can evolve and make decisions that allow maintain control, attract talent and raise capital with sustainability.
Vesting, the option pool and other key mechanisms to protect equity
One of the most common mistakes in the initial stages is not to properly establish the mechanisms of Vesting for founders and key employees. Vesting is an agreement through which shares or shares are awarded progressively over time, normally conditioned on active permanence in the project. The most common scheme is a Vesting at 4 years old with a 1-year-old Cliff, which means that if a founder or early employee leaves before completing the first year, they will not be entitled to any participation.
This type of mechanism is essential to avoid problematic situations in future phases. If a co-founder leaves shortly after and retains 20-30% of the capital without remaining linked to the company, it not only generates internal tensions, but it also becomes an alarm signal for future investors. A cap table with inactive shareholders seriously penalizes the credibility and attractiveness of the project.
Another critical point is the creation of a Stock Option Pool in early stages. This background (usually between the 10% and 15% of the capital) is reserved to encourage key employees through stock options. Its main advantage is that it allows you to return with equity without having to open new rounds or dilute unnecessarily. Not planning it in advance can be expensive: if it hasn't been defined before a round, it's common for investors to demand its creation post-investment, implying that the dilution will fall entirely on existing partners.
In addition, it is advisable to incorporate certain clauses that, although they sound legal, have a strong strategic impact on the shareholder structure:
- Anti-dilution clause: protects investors against future rounds at lower valuations (down rounds), ensuring that they keep their percentage or receive additional shares.
- Drag-along: allows that, if an agreed majority decides to sell the company, the rest of the partners are obliged to accompany the transaction.
- Tag-along: gives minority shareholders the right to join a sale if majority shareholders decide to sell their shares.
Having these mechanisms not only protects the founders' position, but also provides seriousness, foresight and professionalism to investors. A well-structured cap table reflects that the promotion team thinks about the long term and is ready to lead a scalable company.
How your cap table evolves at different stages of funding
Let's imagine a startup with two founders starting with 50% each. Although it is still a fairly common practice, it is not recommended to establish an exactly equal distribution (50/50). This type of structure can create blocks in key decision-making, especially if tiebreaker mechanisms or special rights have not been defined for any of the partners. If you want to maintain an equitable situation between founders, it would be best to opt for a distribution such as 51/49, which allows us to maintain alignment but avoid corporate ties that could jeopardize the governance of the project.
That said, to facilitate the calculations and the practical example, we will start from a 50/50 scenario, without yet having incorporated an option pool or non-dilutive financing instruments such as public aid or soft loans.
Initial situation:
- Founder A: 50%
- Founder B: 50%
Pre-Seed Round:
200,000€ is raised in exchange for 15%
- Founder A: 42.5%
- Founder B: 42.5%
- Pre-Seed Investors: 15%
Seed Round:
600,000€ is raised in exchange for 20%
- Founder A: 34%
- Founder B: 34%
- Pre-Seed Investors: 12%
- Seed Investors: 20%
Series A:
2,000,000€ is raised in exchange for 25%
- Founder A: 25.5%
- Founder B: 25.5%
- Pre-Seed: 9%
- Seed: 15%
- Series A: 25%
In this scenario, the combined founders control 51% after three rounds. But if, at this point, investors ask to create a 10% pool (something common if it doesn't exist yet), the founders would fall below 45% combined, which is starting to be a point of friction for more advanced funds.
Now imagine that one of the founders leaves the company after the Seed round without vesting. Its inactive 25% is a time bomb for the cap table. All of this can be avoided with planning and transparency from the start.
A healthy cap table You must foresee these scenarios, reserve space for a reasonable stock option pool (10-15%) and, if possible, combine equity with non-dilutive instruments (such as soft loans or grants) to preserve control. Investors also want to see motivated founders. If they see that you've become diluted too soon, they may consider it a risk.
How to Minimize Dilution Without Stopping Your Growth
Minimizing dilution does not mean avoiding inverters, but negotiate wisely, diversify funding sources and build traction before each round. Here are some key strategies:
- Lift only what is needed to reach the next relevant milestone. Many founders overestimate their capital needs at an early stage, forcing them to give up more equity than necessary. It's better to close a smaller round and demonstrate traction than to dilute a lot without market validation.
- Evaluate alternative instruments such as ENISA or CDTI, which make it possible to raise capital without giving up equity. Intelectium recommends taking advantage of the funding opportunities offered by public entities at the national and regional levels to leverage the round of private financing and reduce the necessary external capital.
- Anticipate future equity needs and design a dilution plan. Use simulations to see what the cap table would look like in 1, 2 or 3 more rounds. Do you remain at least 20-25% as a founder when you reach Serie A? If not, the strategy needs to be readjusted.
The objective is to have a sustainable growth strategy, without reaching a Series A with unmotivated founders or a captable structure that blocks future rounds.
Conclusion: the cap table is your cover letter (and your plan for the future)
The capital structure of a startup is not just another administrative document: it is a direct reflection of how the project has been built, how decisions are made and what is the long-term vision of its founders. In an investment process, the cap table is one of the first elements that investors review. If it's poorly structured—due to excessive early dilution, lack of vesting, lack of incentives for key talent, or misalignment between partners—it can block a round even if the product and the market are promising.
A poorly maintained cap table also has internal consequences: it can generate conflicts between founders, discourage the team and make it difficult to hire strategic profiles. On the contrary, a well-designed cap table allows for clear progress, protects founders' motivation and transmits trust to all stakeholders involved in the company's growth.
That's why it's essential that founding teams:
- Plan ahead for funding milestones and how they will affect the distribution of shares.
- Simulate dilution scenarios to understand the impact of each round.
- Periodically review the structure as business needs evolve.
- And, above all, they seek advice from experts in financing and corporate structure.
Caring for the cap table is not an optional or secondary task: it is a key strategic piece for building an ambitious, scalable and attractive company. Because raising capital is only part of the way: maintaining control, staying motivated and attracting the best talent is what makes the difference in the long term.
Do you want to analyze your cap table or prepare for your next round?
Intelectium helps startups to structure their funding strategy, plan their capital table, raise private capital and leverage it with public funding (ENISA, CDTI, regional grants).
.png)
.png)
